Article 13 of the Indian Constitution: Laws Inconsistent with or in Derogation of the Fundamental Rights - Explainer

12/1/20232 min read

flag hanging on pole
flag hanging on pole

Introduction

The Indian Constitution is the supreme law of the land, providing the framework for governance and safeguarding the fundamental rights of its citizens. Article 13 of the Constitution plays a crucial role in ensuring the protection of these rights by declaring any law that is inconsistent with or in derogation of the fundamental rights as void.

Understanding Article 13

Article 13 is a significant provision in the Constitution that aims to protect the fundamental rights granted to individuals. It states that any law, whether pre- or post-constitutional, that violates or goes against the fundamental rights is considered void to the extent of the inconsistency.

This means that if any law, rule, regulation, or executive order is found to be in conflict with the fundamental rights enshrined in Part III of the Constitution, it will be declared null and void to the extent of the inconsistency. The fundamental rights include the right to equality, freedom of speech and expression, protection of life and personal liberty, and more.

Scope of Article 13

Article 13 covers both pre- and post-constitutional laws. Pre-constitutional laws refer to laws that were in existence before the adoption of the Constitution in 1950. Post-constitutional laws, on the other hand, are laws enacted after the adoption of the Constitution.

Under Article 13, any law that is inconsistent with or in derogation of the fundamental rights is void ab initio, which means it is deemed to be invalid from the very beginning. This provision ensures that the fundamental rights of individuals are not violated by any legislation, whether enacted before or after the Constitution came into force.

Judicial Review and Article 13

Article 13 grants the power of judicial review to the courts, enabling them to strike down any law that violates the fundamental rights. The judiciary acts as the guardian of the Constitution and has the authority to interpret the Constitution and determine whether a law is in line with the fundamental rights or not.

Through the power of judicial review, the courts can declare a law unconstitutional and nullify it if it infringes upon the fundamental rights. This ensures that the legislature does not exceed its powers and acts within the limits set by the Constitution.

Conclusion

Article 13 of the Indian Constitution is a crucial provision that safeguards the fundamental rights of individuals. It acts as a check on legislative powers, ensuring that no law can violate the fundamental rights enshrined in the Constitution. Through the power of judicial review, the courts play a vital role in upholding and protecting the fundamental rights of the citizens of India.

By declaring any law inconsistent with or in derogation of the fundamental rights as void, Article 13 ensures that the rights and liberties of individuals are respected and upheld, contributing to a just and democratic society.