Article 161 of the Indian Constitution: Power of Governor to Grant Pardons, etc., and to Suspend, Remit or Commute Sentences in Certain Cases

12/20/20235 min read

person holding white samsung android smartphone
person holding white samsung android smartphone

Introduction

Article 161 of the Indian Constitution empowers the Governor of a state with the authority to grant pardons, reprieves, respites, or remissions of punishment or to suspend, remit, or commute the sentence of any person convicted of any offense against a state law or a law relating to a matter to which the executive power of the state extends.

This article is similar to Article 72 of the Indian Constitution, which grants the President of India the power to grant pardons, reprieves, respites, or remissions of punishment or to suspend, remit, or commute the sentence of any person convicted of any offense against a central law or a law relating to a matter to which the executive power of the Union extends.

Understanding Article 161

Article 161 is an essential provision in the Indian Constitution that ensures the executive power of the state is not limited to the judiciary's decisions. It allows the Governor to exercise mercy and compassion in appropriate cases, providing an opportunity for the reformation and rehabilitation of individuals.

The power vested in the Governor under Article 161 is discretionary, meaning it is not absolute and can be exercised based on the Governor's subjective satisfaction. However, this discretion is not arbitrary and must be exercised in accordance with established principles of law and justice.

The Governor's power under Article 161 is not limited to granting pardons alone. It also includes the power to reprieve, respite, remit, suspend, or commute sentences. Let's understand each of these terms:

1. Pardon

A pardon is an act of forgiveness granted by the Governor, which completely absolves the convicted person of the offense and its consequences. Once a pardon is granted, the person is treated as if they were never convicted of the offense. This means that all legal disabilities arising from the conviction are removed, and the person's rights and privileges are fully restored.

2. Reprieve

A reprieve is a temporary suspension of the execution of a sentence. It is usually granted to allow the convicted person some time to appeal for a pardon or to seek legal remedies. The duration of a reprieve varies and is determined by the Governor.

3. Respite

A respite is the temporary postponement of the execution of a sentence. It is granted in cases where the convicted person is suffering from a physical or mental disability or is in a vulnerable condition. The purpose of a respite is to provide the person with an opportunity to recover or improve their condition before the sentence is carried out.

4. Remission

A remission is a reduction in the severity or duration of a sentence without completely absolving the convicted person of the offense. It is granted based on considerations of justice, equity, and public interest. The power to remit a sentence allows the Governor to reduce the punishment imposed on a convicted person.

5. Suspension

Suspension refers to the temporary postponement or delay of the execution of a sentence. It is often granted in cases where there are doubts about the correctness of the conviction or when fresh evidence emerges that may impact the outcome of the case. The purpose of suspension is to ensure that justice is not compromised and that the person's rights are protected.

6. Commutation

Commutation involves the substitution of one form of punishment for another, usually a less severe one. It is granted when there are grounds for believing that the original sentence is excessive or unjust. Commutation aims to balance the interests of justice with the need for leniency and mercy.

Criteria for Granting Pardons, etc.

While Article 161 grants the Governor the power to grant pardons, reprieves, respites, remissions, suspensions, or commutations, it does not prescribe any specific criteria for exercising this power. However, the Governor must consider the following factors:

1. Merit of the Case

The Governor must evaluate the merits of the case, including the nature and gravity of the offense, the circumstances surrounding the offense, and the impact of the offense on the victim and society. The Governor should also consider any mitigating factors or evidence of reformation presented by the convicted person.

2. Public Interest

The Governor must consider the interests of society while exercising the power under Article 161. This involves balancing the need for punishment with the potential for reformation and rehabilitation. The Governor should also consider the impact of the decision on public confidence in the justice system.

3. Judicial Opinions

The Governor may take into account the opinions of the judiciary, including the trial court, appellate court, and any recommendations made by the Law Department or the State Government. While the Governor is not bound by these opinions, they can provide valuable insights into the case.

4. Humanitarian Grounds

The Governor may consider humanitarian grounds while exercising the power under Article 161. This includes factors such as the age, health, or mental condition of the convicted person, as well as any other circumstances that may warrant mercy or compassion.

Limitations on the Governor's Power

While the Governor has discretionary power under Article 161, there are certain limitations imposed to ensure the power is not misused or exercised arbitrarily:

1. Judicial Review

The exercise of the Governor's power under Article 161 is subject to judicial review. If the Governor's decision is found to be arbitrary, irrational, or in violation of any fundamental rights, it can be challenged in a court of law.

2. Constitutional Morality

The Governor's power must be exercised in accordance with the principles of constitutional morality. This means that the power should not be used for personal or political reasons but should be guided by considerations of justice, fairness, and the welfare of society.

3. Consultation with the Council of Ministers

While the Governor has the authority to exercise the power under Article 161, it is advisable for the Governor to consult with the Council of Ministers before making a decision. This ensures that the decision is made after considering various perspectives and expert opinions.

4. Non-Interference in Judicial Proceedings

The Governor's power under Article 161 does not extend to interfering with ongoing judicial proceedings. The power can only be exercised after the conviction and sentencing process is complete.

Conclusion

Article 161 of the Indian Constitution grants the Governor the power to grant pardons, reprieves, respites, remissions, suspensions, or commutations in certain cases. This power allows the Governor to exercise mercy and compassion and provides an opportunity for the reformation and rehabilitation of convicted individuals.

While the Governor's power under Article 161 is discretionary, it must be exercised in accordance with established principles of law and justice. The Governor must consider factors such as the merit of the case, public interest, judicial opinions, and humanitarian grounds.

However, there are limitations on the Governor's power to ensure it is not misused or exercised arbitrarily. The exercise of the power is subject to judicial review, must adhere to constitutional morality, and should involve consultation with the Council of Ministers.

Overall, Article 161 strikes a balance between the need for punishment and the potential for reformation, ensuring that justice is served while providing avenues for mercy and compassion in appropriate cases.