Article 370 of Indian Constitution: Temporary provisions with respect to the State of Jammu and Kashmir

12/21/20233 min read

man sitting on boat selling different fruits
man sitting on boat selling different fruits

Article 370 of the Indian Constitution is a temporary provision that grants special autonomous status to the state of Jammu and Kashmir. It was included in the Constitution on 17th October 1949 and came into effect on 26th January 1950, the day the Constitution was adopted.

The purpose of Article 370 was to provide a framework for the governance of Jammu and Kashmir, taking into account its unique circumstances and historical background. It recognizes the special status of the state and grants it certain privileges and powers that are not available to other states in India.

Background of Article 370

At the time of India's independence in 1947, Jammu and Kashmir was a princely state ruled by Maharaja Hari Singh. The state had the option to join either India or Pakistan, or to remain independent. Maharaja Hari Singh initially wanted to remain independent but faced pressure from both India and Pakistan.

Under the leadership of Sheikh Abdullah, the National Conference party in Jammu and Kashmir supported the idea of joining India. As a result, the Instrument of Accession was signed between Maharaja Hari Singh and the Government of India, making Jammu and Kashmir a part of India.

However, the accession of Jammu and Kashmir to India was made subject to certain conditions. These conditions were later incorporated into Article 370 of the Indian Constitution.

Provisions of Article 370

Article 370 grants special autonomous status to the state of Jammu and Kashmir. It provides for a separate constitution, a separate flag, and separate laws for the state. The central government's jurisdiction over the state is limited to defense, foreign affairs, and communications.

Under Article 370, the Indian Parliament can only make laws for Jammu and Kashmir with the consent of the state government. This means that the state has the power to decide which laws passed by the Indian Parliament are applicable to it.

Additionally, Article 370 prohibits the application of certain provisions of the Indian Constitution to Jammu and Kashmir. This includes provisions related to fundamental rights, emergency provisions, and amendments to the Constitution.

Furthermore, the President of India has the power to modify or abrogate Article 370, but only with the concurrence of the Constituent Assembly of Jammu and Kashmir. Since the Constituent Assembly no longer exists, this provision has been a subject of debate and controversy.

Controversies surrounding Article 370

Over the years, Article 370 has been a topic of intense debate and controversy. Critics argue that it has hindered the integration of Jammu and Kashmir with the rest of India and has given rise to separatist sentiments in the state.

They argue that the special status granted to Jammu and Kashmir has led to a sense of alienation among the people of the state and has prevented the full implementation of central government policies and programs.

On the other hand, supporters of Article 370 argue that it is necessary to protect the unique identity and culture of Jammu and Kashmir. They believe that any attempt to abrogate or dilute Article 370 would be a violation of the state's rights and would undermine its autonomy.

Another point of contention is the unequal treatment of residents of Jammu and Kashmir compared to residents of other states in India. Under Article 370, people from other states cannot purchase land or property in Jammu and Kashmir, which has been criticized as discriminatory.

The future of Article 370

In August 2019, the Indian government made a significant decision regarding Article 370. It revoked the special status of Jammu and Kashmir and bifurcated the state into two union territories - Jammu and Kashmir, and Ladakh.

This move has sparked a fresh wave of debates and discussions about the future of Article 370. While some argue that its revocation was necessary for the development and integration of Jammu and Kashmir, others believe that it was a violation of the state's rights and autonomy.

It remains to be seen how the situation unfolds in the coming years and what impact it will have on the governance and relationship between the central government and the state of Jammu and Kashmir.

Conclusion

Article 370 of the Indian Constitution is a temporary provision that grants special autonomous status to the state of Jammu and Kashmir. It has been a subject of intense debate and controversy since its inception.

While some argue that it has hindered the integration of Jammu and Kashmir with the rest of India, others believe that it is necessary to protect the unique identity and culture of the state.

The recent revocation of Article 370 has added a new dimension to the ongoing discussions about its future. Only time will tell what impact this decision will have on the governance and relationship between the central government and the state of Jammu and Kashmir.